Adversary / Overview
Adversary 1.0 · Public betaSign in
PERSON · BUSINESS MODEL · BUSINESS · ORGANIZATION · COUNTRY

Information advantage.
In every competition.

Build a private opponent model. Turn evidence into signals, strategy and a better next move.

2 active models · 10 AI requests · no card required
Adversary — two opposing forms forming an AADVERSARYGAIN THE INFORMATION ADVANTAGE
EXPLORE ADVERSARYOpen a title to explore
1What can I analyze?

A model can represent a person, company, business model, institution or country. You define the objective and supply dated observations or sources. Country analysis focuses on public policy, trade, economics and diplomacy.

2How does it work?
  1. Build a model

    Choose the entity, describe your objective and add what you already know.

  2. Add observations

    Save actions, statements, source links and outcomes. Keep facts and impressions separate.

  3. Request analysis

    Get behavior signals, supporting records, alternative explanations and a specific next step.

  4. Prepare and update

    Rehearse the next move, then add the real result and request a fresh review.

3What feedback will I receive?
  • An evidence-based reading of the situation and the opponent’s incentives or operating model.
  • Red, yellow, green or unknown signals linked to specific behavior.
  • Source records, alternative explanations and questions to verify.
  • A next-step card, scenario rehearsal and a saved review history.

Example: a deadline mismatch may be a red risk; willingness to accept staged delivery may be a green opening. The next move is to verify the first-batch requirement, then rehearse a proposal.

4What do the signal colors mean?
Risk · act carefully

An evidenced obstacle or material risk relative to your objective.

Uncertain · verify

Ambiguous behavior, a tentative pattern or a possible next move.

Opening · explore

An evidenced opportunity to make progress; confirm the conditions.

Unknown · gather evidence

Not enough evidence. Add a record or ask a clarifying question.

Signals describe behavior in context, not a permanent label. They refresh when you request a new review. Live monitoring and automatic alerts are not included.

5Free trial & membership2 FREE MODELS

Start free with 2 active opponent models and 10 AI requests, without a one-week deadline or payment card. Save observations, receive analyses, try scenarios and export your records.

Planned membership: US$12/month for 20 active models and 100 AI requests per month. Proposed pricing only; paid subscriptions are not yet available.

6Private records. Evidence-first analysis.

Your models and history belong to your signed-in workspace. AI receives your selected records only when you request a review or practice. Ordinary saving does not call AI. Models are built from your information; this pilot does not independently search the web or know hidden intentions.

7About Adversary Lab

Adversary.com is run by Adversary Lab.

From individual competition to confrontation between nations.

Adversary Lab focuses on opponent modeling and adversarial scenario exploration. We help people turn accumulated information into a clearer view of a situation, its risks and opportunities, and their next move.

Know yourself and know your opponent. Examine the other side’s objectives, actions and operating logic alongside your own assumptions, constraints and options. Consider an opponent’s capabilities broadly; hold your own preparation to a rigorous standard.

Across individuals, businesses, business models, institutions and countries, our aim is to make observation, scenario practice and review useful foundations for better-informed judgment.

Adversary 1.0 is now open for public beta testing. Bring real questions, try the model and help us improve.

8Founder’s Words

Why I launched Adversary 1.0

To me, society is a vast jianghu: a world of relationships, competing interests and shifting circumstances. Between people, businesses, institutions and nations, cooperation exists alongside competition and confrontation. Whether we believe people are good by nature or take a more cautious view, we need to prepare for conflicting interests, unequal capabilities and changing conditions.

My principle is to consider an opponent’s capabilities and possible actions broadly, while holding my own preparation and defenses to a rigorous standard.

In the AI era, information travels faster, capabilities expand and competition evolves more quickly. Recognizing a possible move earlier can give us more time, room and options to respond. That is why I launched Adversary 1.0.

The project’s intellectual starting points include The Art of War, The Book of Five Rings, the Arthashastra and On War, alongside ideas from psychological and behavioral analysis. I am interested in how these perspectives approach interests, power, timing, judgment and uncertainty, and how that thinking can inform competition today.

I want Adversary to help people keep observing, test assumptions, explore responses and revise their judgment as real outcomes emerge. A clearer understanding of an opponent — and of ourselves — can leave more room for the next move.

Adversary 1.0 welcomes testing, feedback and challenge.

— Founder, Adversary Lab

9Work with Adversary Lab

Explore investment, co-development and strategic partnerships for Adversary 1.0.

Adversary Lab Studio
Kumeu, Auckland, New Zealand